Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2014, 09:16 PM
MSGGrunt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Western, Massachusetts
Posts: 46
OM617 Intake/Exhaust Manifold Gasket Help

I searched, but clearly not well enough it seems.

I took off the intake/exhaust manifold as part of my turbo rebuild on my 1982 300SD and have a couple questions.

1. What gasket should I use? Erling? Victor Reinz? What is OEM?
2. Would copper spray hurt, help, or really not needed. I have read different opinions.
3. I know the torque specs for the intake nuts are elusive or even non existent but, people must be tightening them to some value? What should I tighten the nuts to?
4. Is it a good idea to replace the manifold studs and nuts or really not necessary?

__________________
1982 300SD
1992 190e 2.3 8v
2002 P38 Range Rover
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-01-2014, 11:44 PM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 53,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSGGrunt View Post
I searched, but clearly not well enough it seems.

I took off the intake/exhaust manifold as part of my turbo rebuild on my 1982 300SD and have a couple questions.

1. What gasket should I use? Erling? Victor Reinz? What is OEM?
2. Would copper spray hurt, help, or really not needed. I have read different opinions.
3. I know the torque specs for the intake nuts are elusive or even non existent but, people must be tightening them to some value? What should I tighten the nuts to?
4. Is it a good idea to replace the manifold studs and nuts or really not necessary?
I actually reused My Manifold Gasket by Spraying it down with Copper-Kote. So I know it is not going to hurt. I figured the Glue would burn off and the little Copper particles would squash and seal. But, that likely makes me a Heretic.

If I remember correctly you cannot get a torque Wrench all of them any way.

More importantly I found that My Exhaust Manifold was slightly warped and I fixed that.

You need to be carful on the Torque of the Manfold Nuts becasue the Studs that go into the Head only have about 4 Full threads on them. I know because 2 Studs backed out when I was trying to remove the Nuts.

I found a torque for all Copper Nuts that thread size at some internet Hot Rod type seller and then lost it and can't remember the site. But, the solid Copper Nuts are supposed to prevent over tightening.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-02-2014, 08:48 AM
MSGGrunt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Western, Massachusetts
Posts: 46
I don't want to re-use my old gasket as I had a leak in it and just thought a new one would be cheap insurance.

Talk about price shock.... I won't be replacing the studs with MB OEM. There are 6 of them at $55.00 a piece for 4 and $22.00 for the other two for a grand total of $264.00 for 6 studs.... YIKES...

I hear and understand the issue of over torquing because of the limited thread engagement at the head, which I am sure is fine at the factory with very strict parameters, but now not knowing the torque and probably a tendancy to over torque most things I was wondering this:

Has anyone used a different aftermarket stud? It seems the threaded part that goes into the head could be longer, ie the hole in the head is deeper than the thread is long. And I would think deeper than what would be required for any elongation (if that is even a consideration) of the bolt through heating and cooling?
__________________
1982 300SD
1992 190e 2.3 8v
2002 P38 Range Rover
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-02-2014, 09:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 66
I found a suitable replacement stud at Mc Master Carr for not too much $. Replaced all the copper nuts with new and tightened them until I met a sort of sudden large amount of resistance with a 3/8 inch ratchet. You will know when you get there. No need to overdo it. Also used Permatex Ultra Copper sealant--a thin film on both sides of the gasket surrounding both the intake and exhaust openings. So far no leaks. I had been seeing oil leakage from the intake openings due to blowby oil.
Peter
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-02-2014, 02:44 PM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 53,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by 83TD View Post
I found a suitable replacement stud at Mc Master Carr for not too much $. Replaced all the copper nuts with new and tightened them until I met a sort of sudden large amount of resistance with a 3/8 inch ratchet. You will know when you get there. No need to overdo it. Also used Permatex Ultra Copper sealant--a thin film on both sides of the gasket surrounding both the intake and exhaust openings. So far no leaks. I had been seeing oil leakage from the intake openings due to blowby oil.
Peter
Is this the one that is Silicone?
However, if the Ultra-Copper has Silicone and it worked; it worked.


If so that is not what I used.

The Copper-Kote I used is a thin Rubber Cement with Copper granules/Particles suspended in it. Due to the Exhaust and Intake being combined on the Gasket (I also re-used the Turbocharger to Exhaust Manifold Gasket by coating it with Copper-Kote) I used what I did because I felt the Rubber Cement was going to burn off quickly from the Exhaust portion of the Gasket leaving the smash Copper to do the Sealing.

Something with Silicone Sealant is fine for the Intake part of the Gasket. But, it would not be My choice for the Exhaust parts.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-02-2014, 03:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Wilmington, NC by the Atlantic ocean
Posts: 2,530
Copper-Kote kicks booty! I've used it on head gaskets for years without an issue. I even got a Peugeot Diesel head to seal after repeated tries with different makes of gaskets and other alternative Voo Doo. I also used it on my 617 intake/exhaust gasket but I haven't started the engine yet so I can't swear for the results.

As far as fasteners - McMaster is, of course, a great choice or there's always APR. The ARP stuff exceeds aircraft requirements and they are probably as tough a fastener as you can find anywhere, including Germany. Virtually all NHRA and NASCAR teams run them and they don't use what doesn't work.

As far as torque - as mentioned, you really can't get a torque wrench on many of those fasteners anyhow. In the old Chrysler service manuals they used to specify "mechanic's torque" on many fasteners such as pan bolts, front cover bolts, etc. You develop a feel for what's appropriate after you do this for a while. You might want to teach yourself what, say, 25-30 foot lbs. feels like by clamping a nut in the vice and torquing a bolt into the nut at say, 25 ft/lb. Then grab your ratchet or end wrench or whatever weapon you intend to use and see what it takes to just move that bolt - you'll be at about 30 ft/lb once it moves a tad. That 25/30 ft/lb (or whatever that is in metric) is a decent starting place and you're not likely to break anything with that "feel".

Good luck

Dan
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-02-2014, 07:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 66
Yes, the Permatex Ultra Copper product is a silicon product. One of its suggested uses on the label is exhaust flanges and manifolds so I gave it a try. The FSM suggests that no sealant at all should be used on the manifold gasket but I have tried that with not so much success. The manifold gasket is pretty stiff, and the torque available is limited as discussed.
I am not familiar with the Copper Kote product but will probably give it a try if the silicon fails and I have to do it again.
Peter
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-02-2014, 09:45 PM
MSGGrunt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Western, Massachusetts
Posts: 46
This is the copper spray I am talking about. Seems the common thought is that it isn't a bad idea to use.
Attached Thumbnails
OM617 Intake/Exhaust Manifold Gasket Help-copper-spray.jpg  
__________________
1982 300SD
1992 190e 2.3 8v
2002 P38 Range Rover
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-02-2014, 09:50 PM
MSGGrunt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Western, Massachusetts
Posts: 46
I stripped the exhaust manifold by using electrolysis. Just need a tub, several sacrificial anodes, some washing soda, and a battery charger. Rust is gone in a couple hours... This was my first time using this method and I'm hooked.

After I stripped all the rust I primed and painted using 2000 degree extreme heat paint. My wife was even pretty tolerant of the curing process that is required, ie baking in the kitchen oven.
Attached Thumbnails
OM617 Intake/Exhaust Manifold Gasket Help-electolysis-bath.jpg   OM617 Intake/Exhaust Manifold Gasket Help-exhaust-manifold.jpg  
__________________
1982 300SD
1992 190e 2.3 8v
2002 P38 Range Rover

Last edited by MSGGrunt; 07-02-2014 at 10:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-02-2014, 09:52 PM
MSGGrunt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Western, Massachusetts
Posts: 46
Anyone know where I can order the gasket for the waste-gate cover plate?
Attached Thumbnails
OM617 Intake/Exhaust Manifold Gasket Help-waste-gate.jpg  
__________________
1982 300SD
1992 190e 2.3 8v
2002 P38 Range Rover
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-02-2014, 11:14 PM
MSGGrunt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Western, Massachusetts
Posts: 46
I took some measurements on the exhaust manifold bolts and bolt holes.

The depth of the bolt holes on the head is 22.5 mm
The length of the stud threads is 9.5 mm

So it seems the exhaust studs that thread into the head could have a much longer thread engagement. Why would MB make the threads as short as they did I wonder?

Now the next question is, can I source longer threads that would engage more of the head and be less apt to pull out, strip, or back out
__________________
1982 300SD
1992 190e 2.3 8v
2002 P38 Range Rover
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-03-2014, 09:44 AM
Simpler=Better's Avatar
Ham Shanker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSGGrunt View Post
Anyone know where I can order the gasket for the waste-gate cover plate?
I cut mine from brass shim stock, you can probably get away with something similar.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MSGGrunt View Post
I took some measurements on the exhaust manifold bolts and bolt holes.

The depth of the bolt holes on the head is 22.5 mm
The length of the stud threads is 9.5 mm

So it seems the exhaust studs that thread into the head could have a much longer thread engagement. Why would MB make the threads as short as they did I wonder?

Now the next question is, can I source longer threads that would engage more of the head and be less apt to pull out, strip, or back out
Nothing wrong with more engagement, just make usre you use neversieze. You can buy threaded rod from McMaster and cut to size. They may even have studs in stock.
__________________
$60 OM617 Blank Exhaust Flanges
$110 OM606 Blank Exhaust Flanges
No merc at the moment
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-03-2014, 12:56 PM
MSGGrunt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Western, Massachusetts
Posts: 46
Simpler=Better what thickness did you use? Any idea if copper would work and hold up to the temps?

Just asking as I have some copper flashing left over from adding on to my deck. I'll have to check the thickness. If copper is even a viable option.


Thanks for the shim stock idea. where would I buy this other than on-line?
__________________
1982 300SD
1992 190e 2.3 8v
2002 P38 Range Rover
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-12-2014, 08:12 AM
MSGGrunt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Western, Massachusetts
Posts: 46
OEM gasket arrived... Now I'm just waiting to source a good turbo exhaust turbine housing with no broken studs or bolts so I can start putting everything back together.
Attached Thumbnails
OM617 Intake/Exhaust Manifold Gasket Help-gasket.jpg  
__________________
1982 300SD
1992 190e 2.3 8v
2002 P38 Range Rover
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-12-2014, 11:45 PM
Simpler=Better's Avatar
Ham Shanker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSGGrunt View Post
Simpler=Better what thickness did you use? Any idea if copper would work and hold up to the temps?

Just asking as I have some copper flashing left over from adding on to my deck. I'll have to check the thickness. If copper is even a viable option.


Thanks for the shim stock idea. where would I buy this other than on-line?
Industrial places should have it, any machine shop, etc.

I used whatever was in the drawer, you could probably be fine with flashing, just cut it it in the shape of the contact areas. If you leave large flaps exposed to the exhaust it's going to get hot.

__________________
$60 OM617 Blank Exhaust Flanges
$110 OM606 Blank Exhaust Flanges
No merc at the moment
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page