Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-09-2008, 08:35 PM
Monomer's Avatar
Colonel Blitz
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 835
1990 w124 190e 2.3

I'm looking for one.


This is a great forum and all, but it's quite hard to find info on a specific car. I need to know the model specific problems with the 2.3 I6 w124.



The car's amazing looking for the price, I just want to know if I'm looking at another problem car.

__________________
-1983 VW Rabbit LS Diesel (5speed, VNT/Giles build)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-09-2008, 10:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 2,632
no such thing as a 124 190e
__________________
1989 300ce 129k
( facelifted front,updated tail lights, lowered suspension,bilstein sports, lorinser front spoiler, MOMO steering wheel, remus exhaust,stainless steel brake lines). (Gone)

1997 s320 154k (what a ride). Sold with 179k miles. Replaced with Hyundai Equus

1994 e320 Cabriolet 108k



1972 280se 4.5 153k Owned for 12 yrs, sorry I sold it


[/SIGPIC]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-09-2008, 11:01 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
2.3-16 = W201 chassis (201.034)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-10-2008, 01:05 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ontario
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monomer View Post
I'm looking for one.


This is a great forum and all, but it's quite hard to find info on a specific car. I need to know the model specific problems with the 2.3 I6 w124.



The car's amazing looking for the price, I just want to know if I'm looking at another problem car.
The 2.3 is a 4 cyl, NOT an inline 6. The I-6 for the W201 chassis was the 2.6 litre (M103) engine.
__________________
ARVY

1999 E430
1999 C230 Kompressor
1992 300E (write-off)
1984 190D 2.2 (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-10-2008, 09:23 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 2,632
i think you just have to make sure the suspension is ok with these cars.

It seems like a lot of them look good on the outside, but are beat internally.
__________________
1989 300ce 129k
( facelifted front,updated tail lights, lowered suspension,bilstein sports, lorinser front spoiler, MOMO steering wheel, remus exhaust,stainless steel brake lines). (Gone)

1997 s320 154k (what a ride). Sold with 179k miles. Replaced with Hyundai Equus

1994 e320 Cabriolet 108k



1972 280se 4.5 153k Owned for 12 yrs, sorry I sold it


[/SIGPIC]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-10-2008, 06:10 PM
tvpierce's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 612
As others have stated, the 190E is a 201 chassis. The 2.3 ltr engine is an inline 4.

Here are some of my rambling thoughts on the subject:
You won't see much in the way of problems with them -- it's a rock solid platform with limited "bells and whistles" (read: fewer things to break -- which is extremely important as you are talking about an 18 year old car). The 2.6 L-6 engine is also very strong. It has somewhat of a reputation for head gasket trouble and (if I remember correctly) an oil leak at the timing cover. These are not huge, insurmountable problems by any means -- but worth noting none the less.

The 201 doesn't have automatic climate control (also a good thing IMHO).
The A/C can be a problem spot (as it is in all MBs of this vintage) -- the evaporator gives out and is expensive to have replaced. Most of that cost is labor, so if you can do it yourself, it's quite affordable.

The 2.3 ltr equipped cars are no speed merchants. They are adequately powered, pleasant to drive and quite fuel efficient. I rarely see less than 25 mpg, I've been as high as 30 mpg on an all-highway trip. 23-27 mpg is a reasonable expectation in mixed driving.

I don't quite like the match between the transmission and engine -- at least in my car. The tranny is a little slow to react, and there's a "dead spot" at about 25 mph where it doesn't give you much pull, but it refuses to downshift (for instance, when merging into traffic). The 2.6 ltr would probably have enough torque to pull right through this, but the 2.3 just doesn't. I'm sure the 2.6 is much more responsive in all ranges.

One advantage of the 4 cylinder though is when it comes to service. My 2.3 has plenty of room to work under the hood. The 6 cylinder is really squeezed in there, front to back.

The consensous seems to be that the 201 feels much more nimble than the 124 -- and it should, it's quite a bit smaller. I would not call the 201 a sports car by any means, but when the suspension is in good condition, the handling certainly is sporty.

Now if you're talking about a 2.3 ltr/Cosworth 16 valve, that's a completely different animal. That is a true sports car that was designed for racing. But those are rare, so I assume you're asking about the "normal" 8 valve.

Just my 2 cents! After adjusting for inflation... still arguably worth that.
__________________
Jeff Pierce

Current Vehicles:
'92 Mercedes 190E/2.3 (247K miles/my daily driver)
'93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon (263K miles/a family truckster with spunk)
'99 Kawasaki Concours
Gravely 8120
Previous Vehicles:
'85 Jeep CJ-7 w/ Fisher plow (226K miles)'93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon
'53 Willys-Overland Pickup
'85 Honda 750F Interceptor
'93 Nissan Quest
'89 Toyota Camry Wagon
'89 Dodge Raider
'81 Honda CB 750F Super Sport
'88 Toyota Celica
'95 Toyota Tacoma
'74 Honda CB 550F
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-10-2008, 07:48 PM
Monomer's Avatar
Colonel Blitz
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 835
It's the w201 2.6L six cylinder.



It needs new front shocks. It looks like it's been garaged most of it's life - didnt these cars have a spring perch problem? What about harmonic balancers and the like?

It's got 150k on the clock. I have yet to look at the paperwork, but timing chain stretch should be checked, right?
__________________
-1983 VW Rabbit LS Diesel (5speed, VNT/Giles build)

Last edited by Monomer; 01-10-2008 at 07:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-10-2008, 09:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 52
Smile 190e 2.6

Our '89 had a spring perch problem: The top spring mounts rusted to the point that they bent up. I had them welded back. No subsequent problems.

150,000 miles is nothing. It may need new valve stem seals, if they have not been done.

A 1990 probaly still has R12 in the air conditioner. That is why it no longer works. If it has been converted to R 134A, bonus!

I don't think that timing chain stretch is a problem on these engines. Only the 3.8 litre v-8. However, it is a good idea to watch the cam chain tensioner and the guide rails.

The usual stuff will need repair eventually: antenna mast, window motors, blower switch, water circulating pump, cruise control amplifier, motor mounts, corroded fuses. It looks bad, but this is what I have done over about 5 years.

The transmission only lasted 225,000 miles.

If you do a search on 190e or w201, you will come up with all sorts of comments on longevity, and the things that can go wrong. But really it is a very reliable car.

Andrew
1989 190e 2.6
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-10-2008, 10:04 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
The M103 2.6L is a bit notorious for headgasket leaks, resulting in coolant/oil mix.

At 150K miles, I'll bet that more than just the struts need refreshing in that suspension.

A/C compressor leaks are also not uncommon with the Nippon Denso units. New, they can run up to $1K to replace.

As for the timing chain, chain stretch is not so much an issue as is a worn tensioner.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-11-2008, 10:34 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ontario
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monomer View Post
It's the w201 2.6L six cylinder.

It needs new front shocks. It looks like it's been garaged most of it's life - didnt these cars have a spring perch problem? What about harmonic balancers and the like?

It's got 150k on the clock. I have yet to look at the paperwork, but timing chain stretch should be checked, right?
I think harmonic balancers are only an issue in V6/V8 engines. Inline engines are more naturally "balanced" and thus don't need a balancer. Perhaps a tech can comment more on this.
__________________
ARVY

1999 E430
1999 C230 Kompressor
1992 300E (write-off)
1984 190D 2.2 (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-11-2008, 10:37 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ontario
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvpierce View Post
The 201 doesn't have automatic climate control (also a good thing IMHO).
My 1984 190D had automatic climate control (i.e. there was a thermostat control).
__________________
ARVY

1999 E430
1999 C230 Kompressor
1992 300E (write-off)
1984 190D 2.2 (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-11-2008, 01:21 PM
tvpierce's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 612
Quote:
Originally Posted by arvy View Post
My 1984 190D had automatic climate control (i.e. there was a thermostat control).
Indeed... as does my '92. But it does not have the more complex and more troublesome system which includes automatic fan control.

jp
__________________
Jeff Pierce

Current Vehicles:
'92 Mercedes 190E/2.3 (247K miles/my daily driver)
'93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon (263K miles/a family truckster with spunk)
'99 Kawasaki Concours
Gravely 8120
Previous Vehicles:
'85 Jeep CJ-7 w/ Fisher plow (226K miles)'93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon
'53 Willys-Overland Pickup
'85 Honda 750F Interceptor
'93 Nissan Quest
'89 Toyota Camry Wagon
'89 Dodge Raider
'81 Honda CB 750F Super Sport
'88 Toyota Celica
'95 Toyota Tacoma
'74 Honda CB 550F
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-11-2008, 06:05 PM
Monomer's Avatar
Colonel Blitz
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 835
It don't need ac, and heat just enough to defrost the windows and keeps the fingers warm.

Suspension wise, what am I looking at? also - it seem to have a little vibration in the low end - and needs an alignment (pulls to the right a bit) I'm hopeing it dosnt need a flexdisk or two...


the heat did blow hot, and the ac is said to work. Acc seem to function fine (it has the normal acc vent controls and a different fan control.



Heater hoses were swollen, and will be replace if bought - I learned from my mistake!
__________________
-1983 VW Rabbit LS Diesel (5speed, VNT/Giles build)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-11-2008, 06:35 PM
E150GT's Avatar
I'm a chicken
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
Posts: 1,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajme View Post
Our '89 had a spring perch problem: The top spring mounts rusted to the point that they bent up. I had them welded back. No subsequent problems.

150,000 miles is nothing. It may need new valve stem seals, if they have not been done.

A 1990 probaly still has R12 in the air conditioner. That is why it no longer works. If it has been converted to R 134A, bonus!

I don't think that timing chain stretch is a problem on these engines. Only the 3.8 litre v-8. However, it is a good idea to watch the cam chain tensioner and the guide rails.

The usual stuff will need repair eventually: antenna mast, window motors, blower switch, water circulating pump, cruise control amplifier, motor mounts, corroded fuses. It looks bad, but this is what I have done over about 5 years.

The transmission only lasted 225,000 miles.

If you do a search on 190e or w201, you will come up with all sorts of comments on longevity, and the things that can go wrong. But really it is a very reliable car.

Andrew
1989 190e 2.6
Why would R-12 be the reason it doesn't work?
__________________
1984 300SD Orient Red/ Palomino
1989 560SEC
2016 Mazda 6 6 speed manual
1995 Ford F-150 reg cab 4.9 5speed manual
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-16-2008, 10:56 PM
Monomer's Avatar
Colonel Blitz
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 835
Quote:
Originally Posted by E150GT View Post
Why would R-12 be the reason it doesn't work?
Bump, still looking at this car (well, actually - the girlfriend is)


R-12 is no longer legal to use - and most people don't like converting to 124a...



we're gonna offer $2k and see if he'll take it, the window says 3400 and it's been sitting for quite a bit.

__________________
-1983 VW Rabbit LS Diesel (5speed, VNT/Giles build)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page