|
|
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Jim |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Looks like he competed in most of five full seasons in F1.
Time flies when you are having fun!
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting debate. I'll say Fangio, then Shumaker. Stewart up there to. Stewart only started racing at 24. He was a skeet shooter before that. By 28 he was racing F1.
Mansell, might be on my list too. It s a bit of a steatch though. Also Prost. Now my knocks against Senna. First I think he only won with McKlaren Honda. I remember not to many other makes winning during that time. It wasn't until Ferrari came out with their semi-auto gear box and some other rule changes. I think Prost won a championship during that time. Shumaker won with Bennaton Ford. I think that is when Senna switched to Renualt. I don't respect the way he did that. A few years earlier, he said he wouldn't drive for less than $17 mil per yr. Mansell was making less than him at Renualt. Mansell had just won the Championship. Senna said he would drive for less. Well bad karma. Stewart won with two different teams. He jumped ship after just winning the F1 Championship. He gaged it right. Didn't see the next car developing right. I do wonder about different eras, in all types of racing. I think Dale Earnhart said something to the effect that most of the newer drivers (Gordon) wouldn't survive the racing in the 70's and early 80's. Tom |
Bookmarks |
|
|