Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-03-2010, 10:25 AM
kynsi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pagz View Post
Hey!,
Im just curious as to how the torque looked on each setup!
Hmmm,so why do manufacturers use twin over a single?(surely single is cheaper?)

What sort of rpm are we hoping to see from the 104?

Cheers,
Paul
There was not big torgue at all, maybe good to the 300e tranny which went guite loud lately...
600nm at 6000rpm whith big turbo (not enough revs to get to the torgue peak ).

Twin turbo went 1/4 mile 14.01 last summer. Easy to drive always 14 sec time...
That video in youtube is only 1/4 mile whith big turbo and it was way too slippery to have good time. Time was 13.xx... (hahaa 300e manual 5 speed gearbox ym.1985 )


Last edited by kynsi; 03-03-2010 at 10:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-03-2010, 05:37 PM
PUMPISH's Avatar
Roman Karpovich
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 444
never that saab pistons is better quality then mercedes.
Mercedes pistons is very high quality pistons, much stronger then the most of other car models. Much higher aluminum quality

Use m103 pistons and machine then only in the midle and not the whole surface like you did, its totaly wrong.

I have h-beam rods what you can use with m103 or m104 pistons
__________________
MB 300E 24v Turbo MS3X


TURBOCHARGE YOUR MERCEDES

www.turbobandit.com
My band!
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Turbobandit/135610656626424?fref=ts
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-04-2010, 01:03 AM
kynsi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by PUMPISH View Post
never that saab pistons is better quality then mercedes.

Use m103 pistons and machine then only in the midle and not the whole surface like you did, its totaly wrong.
Even thou aluminium were strong, but reson is that it is so thin. I think saab used highest guality piston material and clearances are what i expect from turbo piston. Also the pin is bigger, what is good to turbo use. But we will see what happen...

I didnt machine hole surface, only 1mm from centre. 5mm was left alone in sides.

You have good results from mercedes 103 piston, but my engine didnt like pressure that much. Ofcourse e85 what you have in Sweden is better fuel for high power.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-04-2010, 03:51 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia
Posts: 584
Kynsi, how much boost were you running when the piston gave up ? Also from Pumpish and your experience with stock internals, can we deduce that the m103/m104 can safely handle 500hp @ the crank on stock internals ?
__________________
190E 3.0-24v (M104 980) turbo @ 0.8 bar
1/4 mile: 2.483 / 13.540 / 175.17 km/h (street tires)
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-04-2010, 10:23 AM
kynsi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joreto View Post
Kynsi, how much boost were you running when the piston gave up ? Also from Pumpish and your experience with stock internals, can we deduce that the m103/m104 can safely handle 500hp @ the crank on stock internals ?
Piston? You mean pistons 5 of them .

Those tiny turbos 1bar, one big 1.3 bar.

One piston were broken long time ago because crack was polished. I suppose that piston went whith small turboes. Most of pistons had fresh cracks. Or maybe cracks just didnt move and they look like new.

I think power depends fuel you use. Pumpish and his mercedes, audi and other cars, makes me think that ethanol burns "softer".
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-04-2010, 11:36 AM
Turbo E320's Avatar
Im a Jeanyus
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Jeffersonville, Indiana
Posts: 475
E85 is 105 octane and a lot more has to be dumped into the cylinders than gas so you could theorize that it kind of 'cushions' the blow.
__________________
1997 Mercedes E320 Turbo
Garrett T3/60-1 Turbocharger
Custom Water Intercooler Setup
352rwhp/366rwtq @ 8.6psi in '08

http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/1051/log7smallay9.jpghttp://img66.imageshack.us/img66/740...s3smallox0.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-04-2010, 01:16 PM
JayRash's Avatar
DON'T PANIC
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Beirut, Lebanon
Posts: 1,281
With E 85 u need to flow alot more to reach the same AFR target, ethanole cools the charge better so coupled with the extra flow needed the charge is better cooled than with just using petrol.
Then the main advantage comes from the extra octane. now this allows 2 things to happen:
1- u can run more advance safely with no knock.
2- from my experience with evo tuning i have learnt that on sudden lift off at high loads when timing is set close to the limit u get knock. this knock is the reason many pistons break.
one way to counter this on normal petrol is to make sure the timing map has no sudden diff in number in the cells.
__________________
Jay,
-----------------
-1995 Blue W202 C36 AMG (M) SOLD ;(
-1995 Black W140 S500 (Lady)
-1992 Black W124 E300 (Dima) (Ex-Mosselman
Twin turbo Kit).
-1988 Black W124 300 E 4-Matic.(Nadeen)
-1983 Brown W126 500SEL.(Old Lady)(Sold)
-1981 Gold W123 280CE.(Dareen)(Sold)
http://www.youtube.com/user/jayrasheed
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-04-2010, 03:12 PM
kynsi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 185
Compression rato sets around 8:1 whith new pistons.

I also noticed that i wrote wrong in my earlier post, my old engine actually had something near 10 compression instead of 9.2.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-04-2010, 08:28 PM
PUMPISH's Avatar
Roman Karpovich
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by kynsi View Post
Even thou aluminium were strong, but reson is that it is so thin. I think saab used highest guality piston material and clearances are what i expect from turbo piston. Also the pin is bigger, what is good to turbo use. But we will see what happen...

I didnt machine hole surface, only 1mm from centre. 5mm was left alone in sides.

You have good results from mercedes 103 piston, but my engine didnt like pressure that much. Ofcourse e85 what you have in Sweden is better fuel for high power.
We have several m103 cars running 98 oktan gas over 1.8 bar without any problem, stock gasket and 9.2 comp

I was running my first kit for 1.7 bar and 98 oktan the whole summer without blowing anything.

Maybe your tuning map is not perfect and your engine spikes
__________________
MB 300E 24v Turbo MS3X


TURBOCHARGE YOUR MERCEDES

www.turbobandit.com
My band!
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Turbobandit/135610656626424?fref=ts
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-04-2010, 08:30 PM
PUMPISH's Avatar
Roman Karpovich
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joreto View Post
Also from Pumpish and your experience with stock internals, can we deduce that the m103/m104 can safely handle 500hp @ the crank on stock internals ?
500hp its just a baby power for m103/104 if the engine in good condition

BUT stil most impotent to TUNE RIGHT!

We had a lot of clients blowing the engines only becaurse of bad tuning and even racing pistons and rods could not safe it...

Get a perfect tune of your EFI and run a lot of safe HP!
__________________
MB 300E 24v Turbo MS3X


TURBOCHARGE YOUR MERCEDES

www.turbobandit.com
My band!
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Turbobandit/135610656626424?fref=ts
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-05-2010, 02:21 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia
Posts: 584
I agree that tuning is one of the most important things and tuning the ignition is very crucial, thats why I like to tune my car a bit conservative i.e. lose say 5 hp but be safe . So I guess that with the right tune 500hp @ crank will be no problem.... something to aim for later this year, first I'll see what number I get @ 1 bar on this turbo.
__________________
190E 3.0-24v (M104 980) turbo @ 0.8 bar
1/4 mile: 2.483 / 13.540 / 175.17 km/h (street tires)
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-05-2010, 05:08 AM
kynsi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by PUMPISH View Post
Maybe your tuning map is not perfect and your engine spikes
maybe i did so. People blow up their engines less boosted. You are guite of tuners. Numbers are impressive.

My case: I just needed to build an engine, and i wanted to test this combination...
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-05-2010, 05:15 AM
kynsi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by PUMPISH View Post
impotent to TUNE
:-)
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-05-2010, 01:30 PM
kynsi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 185
Yess...

Tomorrow im going to get another broken getrak from another diesel fellow. Maybe I can fix that gearbox whith my broken box. My box broke cluth shaft and other box is broken in fourth gear. Dont need 722.3 yet...
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-06-2010, 09:25 AM
kynsi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 185
It seem to be bossible to fix that...




Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page