|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
RPM's
I was wondering if my transmission is set right or what. I have 84' 300SD with a 4 speed auto, and at 67 I'm turning 3000 RPM's and I wanted to know if that to high?
Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Probably. You can get 5500 rpm out of these engines (for short periods), and they will run happily at 5000, so you won't run out of speed. Top speed is on the order of 117 mph, I think.
Peter
__________________
1972 220D ?? miles 1988 300E 200,012 1987 300D Turbo killed 9/25/07, 275,000 miles 1985 Volvo 740 GLE Turobodiesel 218,000 1972 280 SE 4.5 165, 000 - It runs! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I know it doesn't help, but in my 190 D I get 3000 rpm at about 65mph and 4000rpm at about 75mph. The fastest I ever went was 85 mph at 4700rpm.
__________________
1985 190D 2.2l Sold-to Brother-in-law 1996 Mustang 3.8l -"thinks it's a sports car" 1988 Grand Wagoneer - Sold (good home) 1995 Grand Cherokee Ltd -"What was I thinking??!!" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
RDC500,
There is no setting of the transmission that controls RPM in high gear. It is the gear ratio of the differential that determines engine speed in high gear (direct drive on these transmissions). 67 MPH at 3000 RPM is about right for 300SDs. P E H |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
PEH, I think he was asking if he might be stuck in less than high gear..... thus turning too many rpms for the speed...
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
yep
i also get about 67mph @ 3000rpm
__________________
1984 300D Turbo - 231k....totalled 11/30/07 RIP |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
That sounds about right. My 300 TDT does an indicated 70+/- at 3,000 RPM and I know the speedo is a few mph fast. I think the tranny is designed to keep the cruise rpm in that range so if you need to pass the turbo spools up very quickly. I'm not sure but it wouldn't surprise me if the fuel economy is about optimum there too.
__________________
LRG 1987 300D Turbo 175K 2006 Toyota Prius, efficent but no soul 1985 300 TDT(130K miles of trouble free motoring)now sold |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Leather,
He said "Transmission is set right" so I interpreted that as some kind of an adjustment or setting of the transmission. P E H |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I recently purchased a '84 300D and thought the engine rev's a bit much too. Mine is about the same. It is noiser as RPM's rise as well. 3000+ at 70mph is nearly 900 revs higher than my '88 6.2 Chevy Diesel turbo Conversion Van.
It seems it could easily drop 500-800rpm's while increasing fuel mileage and still have plenty of power without downshifting. This would also increase longivity. Even my gas powered Buick Roadmaster rev's lower than this. Diesel torque is higher at lower rpm's than gas engines and should rev slower at highway speeds. - Tom
__________________
'96 C220 138,000mi, '95 E300D 239,000 mi., '87 300TD 214,000mi '88 6.2 Turbo Diesel Chevy Conversion Van 253,000 mi. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The best possible mileage/power with a diesel comes when the engine is operated at its torque peak. Operation at rpms significantly above this peak will result in low mpg. Judging by the way MB geared their US diesels they peak at 2800-3000rpm. Lowering the cruise rpm too far on an MB likely will lug the motor too much. The MBs I have driven only get up on the boost at about 2300-2400rpm at the earliest. A GM diesel is not a good comparison as they start making boost at 1600rpm with a torque peak at 1900rpm, redline at 3600rpm. I know, my truck turns 2100rpm at 72 mph and gets 21mpg on the highway. The best MB mod it would be to use a rear diff from an 85 or a wagon with the 2.88's (i think) as opposed to 3.07's. This should drop your cruise to 3000rpm at 75mph. Not low enough to lug the motor and still allow you to keep up with traffic. RT
__________________
When all else fails, vote from the rooftops! 84' Mercedes Benz 300D Anthracite/black, 171K 03' Volkswagen Jetta TDI blue/black, 93K 93' Chevrolet C2500HD ExCab 6.5TD, Two-tone blue, 252K |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
RPM
I hope it's not to high because my 300sd is right abt there.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
There seems to be a lot of concern lately about highway cruising speed. Please remember that during the early to mid eighties when these cars were built, the U.S. had a 55mph national speed limit that didn't look like it would ever get raised. Try cruising at 55, as these cars were designed, and I think you might be surprised. This is not to say that they won't go faster, because they will. But 55 - 60 should be the sweet spot.
__________________
Rick Miley 2014 Tesla Model S 2018 Tesla Model 3 2017 Nissan LEAF Former MB: 99 E300, 86 190E 2.3, 87 300E, 80 240D, 82 204D Euro Chain Elongation References |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Hmmmm, 55mph..... Now where can I find a place to go that slow. Maybe a school zone? Seriously though, driving 55 around here will get you rear-ended in a hurry. RT
__________________
When all else fails, vote from the rooftops! 84' Mercedes Benz 300D Anthracite/black, 171K 03' Volkswagen Jetta TDI blue/black, 93K 93' Chevrolet C2500HD ExCab 6.5TD, Two-tone blue, 252K |
Bookmarks |
|
|