|
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Sweet mother.....you could eat off that block! Mine is pretty clean but not like that... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Saw the car at the shop today! So when they got in there, they found two bolts of the six had backed out and then the remaining four sheered off. So again, seems the little four banger diesel shook two loose and then decided to throw the pulley! Check those crank pulley screws folks, they can and will back out over time!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Good pics. That was the same deal with mine... I still have one of those bolts.
__________________
Current Diesels: 1981 240D (73K) 1982 300CD (169k) 1985 190D (169k) 1991 350SD (116k) 1991 350SD (206k) 1991 300D (228k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k) Past Diesels: 1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
What is the torque requirement for the crankshaft pulley bolts? I'm betting some may be loosened a bit before you can notice it visually.
__________________
Sam 84 300SD 350K+ miles ( Blue Belle ) |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The issue here is not corroded bolts, it's those 6 bolts that some how came loose, backed out and eventually sheared off. If those bolts did not come loose, you would not be having this problem. How did they come loose? I can think of a few reasons: 1. From the factory. Maybe the torque-ing of those bolts was done on a Friday afternoon and a lot of beer was consumed? 2. Someone R&R those 6 bolts and did not replace with new bolts, did not torque them to spec, and did not use Loctite.
__________________
85 300D turbo pristine w 157k when purchased 161K now 83 300 D turbo 297K runs great. SOLD! 83 240D 4 spd manual- parted out then junked |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
If retorquing, would it not make more sense to remove each bolt one by one, further applying loctite as you went? And which loctite variety?
__________________
1981 240D 4sp manual. Ivory White. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Think what you want, I'm not going to waste time trying to convince you of the reality of how clean the engine block is. The reality is that this does seem to be a relatively systematic problem, in at if even a few people have encountered it, it is something that has been observed to happen. Whether it's a slip up in manufacturing, a matter of the slightly more rough idle of a 240, or what is something we may never know. The use of loctite is probably the big thing here, and it's probably prudent for the bolt torque levels to be verified on these cars, if not removed and retorqued once coated with loctite. It's as prudent as any other preventive mod that we do on these cars.
__________________
Current Diesels: 1981 240D (73K) 1982 300CD (169k) 1985 190D (169k) 1991 350SD (116k) 1991 350SD (206k) 1991 300D (228k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k) Past Diesels: 1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k) |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It's just a horrible location to work. At least with my 240, the fan shroud will not come out, it's too wide and gets caught on the radiator hose. Everything can be done, at a time price... But is the point to do it in place, practically blindly? Or with most everything removed to make it easier? Also, when loctite is used, do threads need to be chased in order to remove residues? I'd be somewhat hesitant to need to use heat and impact to get loctite red off. But if you're going to commit to one that will face the elements and heat cycles, I'd say that's the one.
__________________
Current Diesels: 1981 240D (73K) 1982 300CD (169k) 1985 190D (169k) 1991 350SD (116k) 1991 350SD (206k) 1991 300D (228k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k) Past Diesels: 1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k) |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If the threads are clean with no trace of rust or anti-seize (which should not be there in the first place), then no chasing with a tap should be preformed. Chasing will invariably make the bolt/ thread fit looser than it was- you don't want that. Just spray it with brake clean before applying Loctite.
__________________
85 300D turbo pristine w 157k when purchased 161K now 83 300 D turbo 297K runs great. SOLD! 83 240D 4 spd manual- parted out then junked |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Note the person said retorquing. Not extracting sheared bolts or doing a repair right. If this has a root cause, which is not fixed by doing it once (I.e. One would want to do it for peace of mind), having to take that many steps turns into a hassle, which means it won't get done. Having something with cured loctite means to me that threads would not be the same as if it was metal to metal only. Fixing it the right way the first time, sure. Remove the stuff. On mine I was pulling the compressor anyway. If one is not, evacuating to pull the condenser on an R12 system is a pricy proposition. And if even loctite red won't give peace of mind due to the consistent vibration and thermal cycling on this part, then a routine torque check may be prudent. If that's the case, removing a ton of stuff is impractical. Mine went at 70k. That means that a 60k-ish retorque may be prudent if we don't know otherwise about the true cause. Removing everything to do that just isn't practical. And the context I was stating was for re-checking. I'm surprised you would think anyone wouldn't do the most rigorous processs possible after a failure.
__________________
Current Diesels: 1981 240D (73K) 1982 300CD (169k) 1985 190D (169k) 1991 350SD (116k) 1991 350SD (206k) 1991 300D (228k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k) Past Diesels: 1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k) |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
85 300D turbo pristine w 157k when purchased 161K now 83 300 D turbo 297K runs great. SOLD! 83 240D 4 spd manual- parted out then junked |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That is a great idea!!
__________________
Current Diesels: 1981 240D (73K) 1982 300CD (169k) 1985 190D (169k) 1991 350SD (116k) 1991 350SD (206k) 1991 300D (228k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k) Past Diesels: 1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k) |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
240D dumped its coolant, belts slack
So I’ve put a few hundred miles on the car since the pulley and new belts were put in and I have to say that it runs realllyyy smoothly at high rpms and actually pulls quite well. I even taped a 21 second 0-60mph for the hell of it hahaa. It’s quite a marked difference in what I’d call a robust and responsive power application - albeit low power, but when something is off and you probably only have 50 ponies left on a good day, it’s quite noticeable.
https://youtu.be/kbZR4SSNa44 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Last edited by 240Dee; 06-17-2018 at 04:27 PM. |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Beautiful color, BTW.
__________________
Current Diesels: 1981 240D (73K) 1982 300CD (169k) 1985 190D (169k) 1991 350SD (116k) 1991 350SD (206k) 1991 300D (228k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k) Past Diesels: 1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k) |
Bookmarks |
|
|