Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-14-2014, 09:27 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Barrington, RI
Posts: 5,919
Does soot in the intake find its way into the engine oil?

On another thread, this issue came up...but I thought I'd create a thread that directly addresses the question.

Does soot that enters through the intake manifold, via a functioning EGR, contribute to the soot in the engine oil? From various sources, I thought the answer to this question was definitely "yes." However, at least one person with a lot more knowledge than I have says "no," at least not to any significant degree.

Any answers and explanations are appreciated. Thanks.

__________________
14 E250 Bluetec 4Matic "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 157k miles
06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 175k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU
91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver on Tan, 144k mi, wastegate conversion, ALDA delete

19 Honda CR-V EX 70k mi
Fourteen other MB's owned and sold
1961 Very Tolerant Wife
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-14-2014, 09:29 AM
toomany MBZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Va
Posts: 7,820
Maybe if the valves are not adjusted or not seating properly?
__________________
83 SD

84 CD
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-14-2014, 09:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,971
I think it's safe to say that nonfunctioning EGR valves do not contribute to soot in the crankcase. When in doubt, play safe.
__________________
When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-14-2014, 09:53 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Barrington, RI
Posts: 5,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by tangofox007 View Post
I think it's safe to say that nonfunctioning EGR valves do not contribute to soot in the crankcase. When in doubt, play safe.
That much I knew!
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec 4Matic "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 157k miles
06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 175k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU
91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver on Tan, 144k mi, wastegate conversion, ALDA delete

19 Honda CR-V EX 70k mi
Fourteen other MB's owned and sold
1961 Very Tolerant Wife
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-14-2014, 10:18 AM
mach4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego County, CA
Posts: 2,736
I would say that the answer is logically and technically "yes", but the actual amount is probably unmeasurable.

Soot comes from combustion and over time finds it's way into the engine oil. With an EGR system, there is an amount of combustion gasses that are recirculated into the intake and become part of the mix of soot that are created by combustion. So combustion soot + EGR soot is the new base amount of soot that can find its way into the engine oil.

So the real question becomes, how much EGR gas is introduced. I couldn't find an actual answer but one source suggested that it could be up to 50% at idle. I find that a bit hard to believe, but who knows. At cruise it's probably in the low single digits...maybe less.

No matter what the amount, as said before, it's best to just be safe and just recirculate the EGR gasses to the exhaust where they belong and not the intake where they are guaranteed to muck up your intake, reduce mileage and decrease the efficiency of the engine.
__________________
Current Stable
  • 380SL (diesel)
  • Corvette C5
  • Manx
  • Baja Bug
  • F350 Powerstroke
  • Auburn Boattail Speedster replica
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-14-2014, 10:20 AM
Diesel Preferred
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 2,789
My opinion: sort of.

The purpose of the EGR is to reduce combustion temperatures to reduce NOX emmisions, to save the planet.

Reducing the combustion temperatures increases the amount of soot produced.

Said soot can then collect on the cylinder walls, and get washed into the oil system, and is removed when you change your oil. While it is suspended in the oil, it increases engine wear.

So, the soot that is already in the exhaust and is re-introduced to the combustion process probably also gets deposited onto the cylinder walls and thus enters the oil, and contributes to oil soot levels.
__________________
Respectfully,
/s/
M. Dillon
'87 124.193 (300TD) "White Whale", ~392k miles, 3.5l IP fitted
'95 124.131 (E300) "Sapphire", 380k miles
'73 Balboa 20 "Sanctification"
Charleston SC
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-14-2014, 10:29 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,963
I think it's safe to say that you won't find any informed answers here. But logically and technically, the answer is "no". There's no path, direct or indirect, that EGR would increase the soot level in the engine oil. Anyone with real data, speak up, I can't see you if you just wave your hands.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-14-2014, 10:40 AM
mach4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego County, CA
Posts: 2,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mxfrank View Post
I think it's safe to say that you won't find any informed answers here. But logically and technically, the answer is "no".
Hmmmm, don't quite know how to read this...
__________________
Current Stable
  • 380SL (diesel)
  • Corvette C5
  • Manx
  • Baja Bug
  • F350 Powerstroke
  • Auburn Boattail Speedster replica
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-14-2014, 10:58 AM
compu_85's Avatar
Cruisin on Electric Ave.
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: La Conner, WA
Posts: 5,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mxfrank View Post
But logically and technically, the answer is "no". There's no path, direct or indirect, that EGR would increase the soot level in the engine oil. Anyone with real data, speak up, I can't see you if you just wave your hands.
Soot from the intake could go past the rings into the oil. As others noted I'd think the difference is minimal. Most all of the soot in the oil comes from "primary" combustion.

-J
__________________
1991 350SDL. 230,000 miles (new motor @ 150,000). Blown head gasket

Tesla Model 3. 205,000 miles. Been to 48 states!
Past: A fleet of VW TDIs.... including a V10,a Dieselgate Passat, and 2 ECOdiesels.
2014 Cadillac ELR
2013 Fiat 500E.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-14-2014, 01:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,963
And recirculated soot can burn up the second time around. It's all conjecture unless someone has a set of oil analyses.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-14-2014, 03:08 PM
Diesel Preferred
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 2,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mxfrank View Post
And recirculated soot can burn up the second time around. It's all conjecture unless someone has a set of oil analyses.
Good point.

However, there is a period of time during the intake stroke when the intake charge air has the opportunity to deposit carbon soot on the cylinder walls, and said cylinder walls are subsequently covered by the piston/rings, and THAT soot is not going to be burned up in the combustion event.

I think it is pretty clear that the EGR is introducing exhaust gases which contain soot, and some of that soot is going to be deposited in the oil and increase the amount of soot in the oil.
__________________
Respectfully,
/s/
M. Dillon
'87 124.193 (300TD) "White Whale", ~392k miles, 3.5l IP fitted
'95 124.131 (E300) "Sapphire", 380k miles
'73 Balboa 20 "Sanctification"
Charleston SC
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-14-2014, 04:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Barrington, RI
Posts: 5,919
Thanks for the responses thus far. I will say that one forum member has done multiple oil analyses on OM60x engines both before and after EGR deletion and found significant soot reduction.
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec 4Matic "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 157k miles
06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 175k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU
91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver on Tan, 144k mi, wastegate conversion, ALDA delete

19 Honda CR-V EX 70k mi
Fourteen other MB's owned and sold
1961 Very Tolerant Wife
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-14-2014, 04:32 PM
jay_bob's Avatar
Control Freak
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 3,942
My anecdotal experience coincides with this. The oil does not get black nearly as fast after an oil change on an engine that has been EGR bypassed.
__________________
The OM 642/722.9 powered family
Still going strong
2014 ML350 Bluetec (wife's DD)
2013 E350 Bluetec (my DD)

both my kids cars went to junkyard in 2023
2008 ML320 CDI (Older son’s DD) fatal transmission failure, water soaked/fried rear SAM, numerous other issues, just too far gone to save (165k miles)
2008 E320 Bluetec (Younger son's DD) injector failed open and diluted oil with diesel, spun main bearings (240k miles)

1998 E300DT sold to TimFreeh
1987 300TD sold to vstech
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-14-2014, 04:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 1,623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mxfrank View Post
I think it's safe to say that you won't find any informed answers here. But logically and technically, the answer is "no". There's no path, direct or indirect, that EGR would increase the soot level in the engine oil. Anyone with real data, speak up, I can't see you if you just wave your hands.
See slide two of this presentation:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCgQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww1.eere.energy.gov%2Fvehiclesandfuels%2Fpdfs%2Fdeer_2008%2Fsession10%2Fdeer08_aja yi.pdf&ei=4ElMU86gMsf38AH184CwDA&usg=AFQjCNH0goZ84AhmFLv4UmQ7PaUV-5zOBw&bvm=bv.64542518,d.b2U
__________________
1968 220D, w115, /8, OM615, Automatic transmission.
My 1987 300TD wagon was sold and my 2003 W210 E320 wagon was totaled (sheds tear).
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-14-2014, 04:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 1,623
Here is a less crazy link for that same presentation. See slide 2:
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/pdfs/deer_2008/session10/deer08_ajayi.pdf

__________________
1968 220D, w115, /8, OM615, Automatic transmission.
My 1987 300TD wagon was sold and my 2003 W210 E320 wagon was totaled (sheds tear).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page