Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-2012, 02:07 AM
Benzeno
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: oakland ca
Posts: 21
1969 camaro om617

i have a 1969 camaro project with a straight 6 3 speed...
i want to put a om617a i have laying around, i want to run wvo...
i dont care about the power, but i want it to be a manual behind it. i was thinking of a t56 sbc version not lsx, with the adaptor from 4x4labs will that work?
i want to get GREAT mpg like mid 30's so i can drive the car everyday, of course not really spending money on the tank...

so far what i will do with the om617 turbo is change glow plugs and delete egr and adjust the alda... valve job ect
what do i search for to find the diagram to run the wires to start the motor and glow plugs how can i alter the rely or whatever? im not too knowledgeable in this swap.

what kind of cold air system should i go and filter i know om617 from reading doesnt go with K&N LMAO.
Also do i need to put an oil cooler, or can i delete that.

i have a 67 camaro with an ls1 t56 so thats why i dont want another gas muscle car since gas is up there...

Please dont Judge me with this, I know people will not like what ill do with my car, but i dont want to spend much. I was looking at 4bt's but i dont know much about it, plus its hard to find. Im with a muscle car club in bay area and trust me ill be hearing hella **** about what ill do, but its my car... ill tell them lets race to San Diego and see who'll make it there first haha... ill be the turtle that beats the rabbit. ill look at it that way

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-12-2012, 02:40 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Out in the Boonies of Hot, Dry, Dusty, Windy Nevada
Posts: 9,680
sounds like an interesting project. have you read through this thread as it has been moving along? He is doing what I have read, won`t work for various reasons. too tall, too long, too heavy too.....

380SL Diesel Conversion Project

Hey, go for it. there use to be a Youtube video of a 67 Mercury Couger with a OM617 engine. can`t seem to find it now.

Charlie
__________________
there were three HP ratings on the OM616...

1) Not much power
2) Even less power
3) Not nearly enough power!! 240D w/auto

Anyone that thinks a 240D is slow drives too fast.

80 240D Naturally Exasperated, 4-Spd 388k DD 150mph spedo 3:58 Diff

We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works

Last edited by charmalu; 03-12-2012 at 10:56 AM. Reason: forgot to add the thread link
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-12-2012, 03:59 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Go for it - sounds like a great conversion - you can only improve a Camaro in my opinion!

I wouldn't expect the mpg figures you are looking for though - how heavy is a Camaro? It's a big old heavy tractor with cart horse rear springs isn't it?
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!

Last edited by Stretch; 03-12-2012 at 04:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-12-2012, 08:41 AM
engatwork's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Soperton, Ga. USA
Posts: 14,150
If you want mpg and don't plan on drag racing go with a 240D non turbo engine. It would be sweet with some kind of 5 speed manual bolted to the back of it. A decent automotive machine shop should be able to facbricate a plate to adapt the tranny to the rear of the 617.

In my opinion I would look for a 606 intercooled turbo diesel out of a 98/99 model to install in front of a 5 speed manual with overdrive. It would be interesting to set it up without the electronics in the engine.
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2012, 08:48 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,991
as long as you understand that the 6.2/5 engine is a direct bolt in, and simple mod, and you could EASILY sell the 617 for twice what you'll pay for a pair of running 6.2's...

also, the 3 speed likely has a 290 or 3.08 rear gear... that should be changed for better acceleration...
it should be fun. I've thought about it on one of my 4 first gens... the camaro is approximately the same curb weight as the 123/126, and if you toss some steel panels for fiberglass, you can offset it more.
take pics.
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 560SL convertible
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
2005 Dodge Sprinter 2500 158"WB
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2012, 10:25 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: St. Thomas PA
Posts: 957
A '69 Camaro is highly collectible. I would sell it and use the $ to finance another project- one who's value you won't kill by modding it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-12-2012, 11:47 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by rscurtis View Post
A '69 Camaro is highly collectible. I would sell it and use the $ to finance another project- one who's value you won't kill by modding it.
bah.
the 69 6/3 is clone fodder. tons of worthless examples out there. also, if all mods are BOLT ON, they are 100% reversible.
ya want one of mine?
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 560SL convertible
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
2005 Dodge Sprinter 2500 158"WB
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-12-2012, 12:25 PM
KarTek's Avatar
<- Ryuko of Kill La Kill
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bahama/Eno Twp, NC
Posts: 3,258
I would second the advice to go with a '98/'99 OM 606 turbo/intercooled. It would certainly deliver the performance and economy unmodified, especially with a t-56.

Mine routinely delivers mid 30's on the highway with the automatic.

The engine is also much more refined and suited to the car's character. The 617 is good for small trucks and plucky sedans for long life and reliability.
__________________
-Evan


Benz Fleet:
1968 UNIMOG 404.114
1998 E300
2008 E63


Non-Benz Fleet:
1992 Aerostar
1993 MR2
2000 F250
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-12-2012, 12:36 PM
Benzeno
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: oakland ca
Posts: 21
i just want it reliable, also i dont really want to find another motor im just wondering how difficult will this be to put the swap into a chevy
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-12-2012, 12:41 PM
KarTek's Avatar
<- Ryuko of Kill La Kill
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bahama/Eno Twp, NC
Posts: 3,258
I've seen 617's in S10 trucks and the biggest problem is the interference between the oil filter housing and the brake booster. On this particular vehicle, the filter was tucked so far back that you couldn't even open it to change the element.

It would probably be easier on the Camaro since it has a longer engine bay designed for the 250-6. You'll also have to convert to a hydraulic clutch most likely.
__________________
-Evan


Benz Fleet:
1968 UNIMOG 404.114
1998 E300
2008 E63


Non-Benz Fleet:
1992 Aerostar
1993 MR2
2000 F250
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-12-2012, 01:32 PM
Orv's Avatar
Orv Orv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 698
You are crazy, but it's a good kind of crazy.

Me, I always wanted to stick a VW 1.6TD in the back of a Baja Beetle...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-13-2012, 07:15 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texafornia
Posts: 5,493
This aint worth commenting on -just
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-13-2012, 07:49 PM
mach4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego County, CA
Posts: 2,736
The biggest problem I see right off the bat, is the Chevys have a rear sump.



Which puts the 617 sump about right in the middle of the crossmember and steering gear.



It's not really feasible to try to go with a rear sump because of the way the 617 oil pump is configured, i.e. you can't just move the pickup.

I saw one conversion where they took everything out and went with a Mustang subframe with rack and pinion ahead of the engine. The 107s use a subframe so it might be possible to drop one of those in. But then you're talking about adapting dissimilar steering gear and all that.

Not saying it can't be done, but it would be a whole bunch of work and engineering to make it happen.
Attached Thumbnails
1969 camaro om617-camaro-1.jpg   1969 camaro om617-camaro-2.jpg  
__________________
Current Stable
  • 380SL (diesel)
  • Corvette C5
  • Manx
  • Baja Bug
  • F350 Powerstroke
  • Auburn Boattail Speedster replica
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-13-2012, 08:55 PM
mach4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego County, CA
Posts: 2,736
Well, lookie here, it can be done...

Bio Diesel 68 Camaro - YouTube



Now I'm really curious how he did it.
Attached Thumbnails
1969 camaro om617-camaro-3.jpg  
__________________
Current Stable
  • 380SL (diesel)
  • Corvette C5
  • Manx
  • Baja Bug
  • F350 Powerstroke
  • Auburn Boattail Speedster replica
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-13-2012, 09:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bayview Idaho
Posts: 25
I think this would be a great project, the 606 would be a nicer engine but no adapters are available for this engine and they are more expensive.
The frame crossmsmber can be modified to clear the 617 sump and reinforced. The front frame clip can also be removed to make this easier.
4x4 labs does make an adapter to use any GM standard transmission.
There are some modified 617 engines on this blog that would blow the doors off of a small block. Go for it. You could go with a truck bellhousing with a slave cylinder for the clutch to make it easier.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page