![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Assuming every thing is right and tight what should one expect to get for average mileage for this 5-cylinder? Assume a 60/40 highway/city mix. I'm looking into buying this car for my 17 year old daughter and was wondering what the average driver could expect?
The reason I wonder is that in driving the last 1500 miles in my 87 SDL I've averaged 30 -31 MPG using 7oz. of Power Service per 20 gal. tank of fuel. This mileage is amazing to me as it easily beats my 4 Cyl. 92 Izuzu PU by 5 MPG. Could I expect a 16.7% increase in a car with one less cylinder? The 617 is 2.5 liters as opposed to my 603 3.0 liter right? Any experiences and opinion are welcome. Thanks all. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I get 23-25 mpg in 80/20 town/highway driving. This is in Westchester NY with a car that has its turbo turned up and therefore the ALDA adjusted to provide a bit more fuel. Also, the valves haven't been adjusted in many many many miles (50K atleast......... yes yes, I know, heresy, I'll be doing it ASAP).
Alex
__________________
1983 300D (parked for four years) 2012 VW Sportwagen TDI Manual 2001 Miata SE 1962 Chevrolet Corvair Rampside |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
The OM603 engine is actually more efficient than the OM617, so no, you won't see an increase in MPG. They might be about equal, although it seems the OM617 tends to get slightly lower MPG unless you drive very conservatively.
The OM603 appears to have almost no MPG penalty at higher speeds, the best MPG I ever got on mine was 30-31, and that was at a steady 80-95 MPH in Idaho & Montana. My normal highway mileage (70-80mph) was more like 28. Weird. Also, the W126/W124 cars with OM603's usually have taller rear ends, due to the extra power availble. For all OM617 & OM603's, don't expect more than upper 20's or low 30's at BEST. If you want more, you need to get a 190D with a 5-speed, these routinely get 30+, can be coaxed up to nearly 40mpg!! The 84-85 4-cylinder models get better MPG but the power is kind of weak compared to the 86-up 5-cylinder. HTH, |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I can't seem to get my car over 22 mpg. It runs perfectly, has lots of zip, minimal smoke, and hardly burns a drop of oil. It starts right up in the morning and is well maintained. I have been using Red Line catalyst to get this improvement because it was only getting about 18 mpg before. I read in this forum of people getting over 25 mpg and I want to know if this is possible. I don't have a real heavy foot but I do like to zip around. Any input would be nice as I have searched the forum and I still don't know the answer.
__________________
1982 300D Turbo "Helga" 380,000 miles |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah, I have the same problem with my '84, it gets 20mpg routinely. Then on one tank it got 24mpg! Then back to 20. (No, it wasn't bad math, that tank went over 400 miles where normally it gets to ~350.) Fuel quality can make a big difference, try a different diesel station. A workmate has an '85 300D and he gets 30-31 on the freeway (light foot).
There are mechanical things that can affect fuel conusmption but normally they also make the car run poorly. Try checking tire pressures, and make sure none of the brakes are dragging. Also check engine oil level, diff oil level, and trans fluid level. Make sure your air filter & fuel filters are clean too. When was your last valve adjust? They're supposed to be every 15kmi, IIRC. Is your EGR valve functioning properly, or correctly disconnected? I've heard of people getting several more MPG by disabling the EGR. If you figure it out, let us know. I'd like to hear what the cause is. Maybe start a new topic, with your specific year+model in the title, like "1984 300D - Runs Great, Crappy MPG - Why?" :p Good luck, |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I also get the same fuel milage from my 84 300dt. I wonder if it is something specific to that year? Within the last 500 miles I have serviced the transmission, changed fuel filters, air filters, and cleaned the overboost protection valve. I am still getting 20-22 mpg.
__________________
82 240D - 257k 84 300d - 86k |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I get 24+ ~ 25+ mpg pretty consistantly on 40/60 hwy/city daily driving. it has K&N air filter(+ 1.5 mpg). I used to get about 23-24mpg. Also I have 15" wheel and larger size tires. But I use the kick down switch quite a bit.
__________________
BJ 09 GL320 Bluetec 65K+ 07 E320 Bluetec 43k+ 05 Nissan Frontier NISMO 4X4 72K+ 07 Kawasaki Vulcan 900 5k+ gone 87 300SDL 158k+ gone 91 300D 113k+ gone 83 300SD 220K+ gone 89 300E sold 87 190E sold 83 380SEL sold http://banners.wunderground.com/bann...TX/Houston.gif |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
1982 300D Turbo "Helga" 380,000 miles |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
When I drove it alot, I was getting anywhere between 23-27 mpg with my '83 300D. 95%highway..speed range between 70-80mph. Brand of fuel used most was Hess...occasionally Texaco ( with a "dose" of Diesel Fuel Catalyst).
Oil used was Castrol 20W50. A/C was on most of the time, Tire pressure checked regularly, and the tires where aligned. (the reason why I mention those things is because they can affect mpg in some fashion) At this time it is getting a rebuilt engine installed. Once I get to drive it around a bit, I will check what this "new" engine will give me mileage wise. -Larry
__________________
It is a truism that almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so. Robert A. Heinlein 09 Jetta TDI 1985 300D |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Note for you fellers with the low MPG
There was some discussion in a thread about timing chain life about how mileage tends to drop a few MPG when the timing chain gets stretched enough to retard the cam timing more than the factory recommended maximum (varies slightly per model). Have you had your cam timing checked lately, and do you have more than 200,000 miles on the motor?
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
1982 300D Turbo "Helga" 380,000 miles |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Instead of swapping final drives, just upgrade to a 1987 300D!
![]() The 87's (W124) have something like a 2.27 rearend, which works out to 25mph per 1000rpm. Therefore: 1000rpm = 25mph 2000rpm = 50mph 3000rpm = 75mph 4000rpm = 100mph It drives quite nicely at 100mph, and yes, the cruise control does work at that speed... (Montana, a few years ago, in case you were wondering.) |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I still like the look of my 82 better than the newer ones. It drives fine, maybe I'm just being fussy. I do like the more recent E class though. Retro styled and quite nice to drive.
__________________
1982 300D Turbo "Helga" 380,000 miles |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
actually 2.65 read end in 87 124 diesel
Actually it is a 2.65 rear end. It equates to about 85mph at around 32-3300 rpm's in 4th gear. I would know, thats what they clocked me at for my ticket when my speedo wasn't working
__________________
Elliot Easton 1987 300D Turbo 151K 1996 C220 stock (Mom's car) |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
After correcting for the odometer error, mine always gets about 22 to 23 mpg. Never varies much Doesn't matter if it is city or highway, fast or slow, uphill or downhill. I think most of them run in this range, although certainly some get mileage in the high twenties. I don't know why there is that much variation between cars.
__________________
Palangi 2004 C240 Wagon 203.261 Baby Benz 2008 ML320 CDI Highway Cruiser 2006 Toyota Prius, Saving the Planet @ 48 mpg 2000 F-150, Destroying the Planet @ 20 mpg TRUMP .......... WHITEHOUSE HILLARY .........JAILHOUSE BERNIE .......... NUTHOUSE 0BAMA .......... OUTHOUSE |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB Midnight Blue W123 300D Turbo; 1984 300D Turbo FOR SALE | Nate Corey | Mercedes-Benz Cars For Sale | 3 | 03-30-2007 12:21 AM |
Get that 300D Turbo out of left field! | KeithG | Diesel Discussion | 22 | 01-06-2003 01:26 AM |
87 300d turbo | cowboy | Diesel Discussion | 6 | 12-13-2002 03:07 PM |
Veg oil in 300D turbo | Fredmburgess | Diesel Discussion | 43 | 11-21-2002 09:53 AM |
85 300D turbo | shoe | Diesel Discussion | 4 | 11-14-2001 09:32 AM |