Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-23-2008, 09:17 PM
God of all things Harley
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbus,Ohio
Posts: 116
Back in 92 I bought a new left over 91 CRX HF, the high fuel economy model. Great gas mileage (average was 42) with highway only trips seeing well over 50MPG. It was solid, well built, simple and had decent acceleration. If Honda were to build this type of car again, I would buy it!!!
As far as hybrids are concerned, they are nothing more than a stepping stone to something better. You won't see one 20 years from now. Just wait till hybrid owners have to start shelling out their own $$$ to replace the big battery pack. Also, do you know how bad it is for the enviroment to produce hybrids? Google it, you might be surprised. Just my 2 cents worth.

__________________
1995 Toyota Pickup
2003 Suzuki Burgmann 400
2002 VW Passat 4Motion V6
1957 Aristocraft Torpedo Boat
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-23-2008, 09:28 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bio300TDTdriver View Post
I think what you said is right on the mark.

My wife wanted a hybrid so we got one. You know, happy wife happy life.
Most of her friends drive minivans that get 15-16 mpg, while she gets 47 mpg. We may never break even on the extra cost in dollars, but there are other costs that matter as much to us.

We can start drilling everywhere Sarah Palin (remember her) wants us too. The reality is we run out of oil some day. It may not be in my life time, but certainly could happen in my kids lifetime. Then we need some alternatives. Hybrids may not be the answer, but we need to start somewhere.

You don't see Honda and Toyota needing a bailout to stay in business. They must be doing something right.
Ummmm.....yeah. Gm has 96,300 employees but more than 1 million freeloaders on the GM healthcare plan! I saw 2 UAW workers on Huckabee last sunday. If these guys are the future of the UAW, one 350 lbs or more and the other one who kept footnoting his entire point with "uh,you know you know" and I wanted to call in and say, "no I don't know"! Toyota does not have this problem! I was blown away when the UAW wasn't even greatful when they got a bailout with our taxpayer dollars to keep their jobs and started *****in' when they were told they would have to take Company stock instead of more benefits! Disgusting! I'm ready to boycott the U.S automakers and bankrupt those idiot liberal extortionist unions so we can compete like everyone else.

Geez, I'm so sick of GIMME GIMME GIMME!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-23-2008, 09:50 PM
BodhiBenz1987's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast
Posts: 3,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by yellowbenz View Post
I love diesels, but seriously the antihybrid attitudes defy logic. Hybrids easily exceed 45mpg at highway speeds (>70mph). No other car is going to do that except a jetta diesel. Yes, earlier cars like crx's and geo metros could do this but they were tin can cars. Small cars just don't get the mileage they should because the safety requirements make them too damn heavy. A necessary tradeoff because your life is certainly worth more than a few more MPG in my opinion. The safety features and interior dimensions of the prius and civic dwarf those other models. The prius is just as big on the inside as a camry and in fact has more leg room in the back than a camry. Ford's new midsized hybrid (fusion) is going to get over 40mpg on the highway.
The Ford Fusion gets 36 on the highway and 41 in the city. I think you've got it backwards ... the hybrid is basically useless on the highway, because it only runs off the engine after a certain point, so it's just a 4-cyl gas engine + an extra deadweight battery. In the CITY hybrids are lengths ahead of internal-combustion-only cars, because the braking constantly recharges the battery. I don't understand why people have to be excessively pro-hybrid or excessively anti-hybrid. If you drive mostly highway, they're nothing special and are way behind a Jetta TDI. If you drive mostly city, they make a lot of sense over a regular gas or diesel car. Different cars for different applications ... there isn't one "better" technology.

I don't think hybrids are dead. Gas prices will go back up. I think they'll suffer because they are more expensive, and people are going to be really, really cheap for a while. Hopefully the niche will remain and it won't slow technological advances with hybrids in the future. A lot of manufacturers have been working on diesel-electric hybrids and I would love to see those hit the road.

I think the biggest challenge in automotive advancement with any techology (diesel, hybrid, plain ol' gas) is that people are stupid. They don't use logic. They follow fads. They want to impress the neighbors and pat themselves on the back. Very few people have any idea how a hybrid works, where it works best, etc.
__________________
1987 300D, arctic white/palomino--314,000 miles
1978 240D 4-speed, Euro Delivery, light ivory/bamboo--370,000 miles
2005 Jeep Liberty CRD Limited, light khaki/slate--140,000 miles
2018 Chevy Cruze diesel, 6-speed manual, satin steel metallic/kalahari--19,000 miles
1982 Peugeot 505 diesel, 4-speed manual, blue/blue, 130,000 miles
1995 S320, black/parchment--34,000 miles (Dad's car)
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:08 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwthomas1 View Post
The diesel locomotives you are speaking of are not hybrids either.
Actually they are, its called a series hybrid.

Common hybrids like what Toyota, Honda and GM sell are parallel hybrids.

Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:19 PM
Unofficial wormcan opener
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ashland, MA
Posts: 2,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by BodhiBenz1987 View Post
The Ford Fusion gets 36 on the highway and 41 in the city. I think you've got it backwards ... the hybrid is basically useless on the highway, because it only runs off the engine after a certain point, so it's just a 4-cyl gas engine + an extra deadweight battery. In the CITY hybrids are lengths ahead of internal-combustion-only cars, because the braking constantly recharges the battery. I don't understand why people have to be excessively pro-hybrid or excessively anti-hybrid. If you drive mostly highway, they're nothing special and are way behind a Jetta TDI. If you drive mostly city, they make a lot of sense over a regular gas or diesel car. Different cars for different applications ... there isn't one "better" technology.



I don't think hybrids are dead. Gas prices will go back up. I think they'll suffer because they are more expensive, and people are going to be really, really cheap for a while. Hopefully the niche will remain and it won't slow technological advances with hybrids in the future. A lot of manufacturers have been working on diesel-electric hybrids and I would love to see those hit the road.

I think the biggest challenge in automotive advancement with any techology (diesel, hybrid, plain ol' gas) is that people are stupid. They don't use logic. They follow fads. They want to impress the neighbors and pat themselves on the back. Very few people have any idea how a hybrid works, where it works best, etc.

I would argue that hybrids are way ahead of the TDIs. The TDIs are usually in the shop because of the plugged up intakes, due to the EGR. I can't stop by me Indie's garage without him showing me one.

You are correct that the huge advantage is in city driving, but we can still get 45 mpg on the highway at 70 mph. My wife can get 50 mpg if she keeps it at 60, but I can't drive that slowly.

I don't think of myself as pro hybrid or diesel. Like you said they both have their advantages. I try to defend the good points of the hybrids. When people start talking about tin cans, and replacing batteries, it irks me. They don't know what they are talking about and probably haven't set foot in a new hybrid.

The funny thing is, we were an hour away from purchasing a low mileage '04 Jetta. Someone beat us there with the cash. In hindsight, I probably have a much happier existence with the purchase we made.
__________________
1987 300TD 309, xxx 2.8.2014 10,000 mile OCI


Be careful of the toes you step on today, as they may be connected to the ass you have to kiss tomorrow. anonymous

“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don’t matter, and those who matter won’t mind.” Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:28 PM
yellowbenz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbia, Missouri
Posts: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by BodhiBenz1987 View Post
The Ford Fusion gets 36 on the highway and 41 in the city. I think you've got it backwards ... the hybrid is basically useless on the highway, because it only runs off the engine after a certain point, so it's just a 4-cyl gas engine + an extra deadweight battery. In the CITY hybrids are lengths ahead of internal-combustion-only cars, because the braking constantly recharges the battery. I don't understand why people have to be excessively pro-hybrid or excessively anti-hybrid. If you drive mostly highway, they're nothing special and are way behind a Jetta TDI. If you drive mostly city, they make a lot of sense over a regular gas or diesel car. Different cars for different applications ... there isn't one "better" technology.

I don't think hybrids are dead. Gas prices will go back up. I think they'll suffer because they are more expensive, and people are going to be really, really cheap for a while. Hopefully the niche will remain and it won't slow technological advances with hybrids in the future. A lot of manufacturers have been working on diesel-electric hybrids and I would love to see those hit the road.

I think the biggest challenge in automotive advancement with any techology (diesel, hybrid, plain ol' gas) is that people are stupid. They don't use logic. They follow fads. They want to impress the neighbors and pat themselves on the back. Very few people have any idea how a hybrid works, where it works best, etc.
Well, I won't quibble about the fusion info. EPA hasn't rated it yet. Only review I can recall for sure was a combined 43mpg city/ highway. However, take your own advice and learn about how the prius works. There is no way that car would get over 40 mpg if the battery/electric motor were not involved in propelling the car at highway speeds. Honestly, it's cool technology that any gear head can get excited about. Furthermore, if you want unbiased info go to the epa site. Jetta diesel 2009 30/41 city/ highway. 2009 Toyota Prius 48/45 city highway.
__________________
Kevin

1978 300D
1979 240D
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:37 PM
BodhiBenz1987's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast
Posts: 3,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bio300TDTdriver View Post
I don't think of myself as pro hybrid or diesel. Like you said they both have their advantages. I try to defend the good points of the hybrids. When people start talking about tin cans, and replacing batteries, it irks me. They don't know what they are talking about and probably haven't set foot in a new hybrid.
That stuff irks me too ... but it goes back to what I said before ... people are stupid. They decide they either like hybrids or don't and just repeat random things they heard that support whichever position they like. I can see positives and negatives of hybrids, as well as TDIs (BTW, when I said TDIs were miles ahead of hybrids on the highway, I meant that strictly in the mpg sense ... I haven't owned either so I can't comment on durability, convenience, cost to maintain, etc.).

I hate it when people write off hybrids because they don't like the image or they have some idea about "dangerous" batteries or "tin can" quality. I also hate it when they try to tell me a hybrid SUV that gets 20 mpg is more "green" than a gasoline sedan that gets 41 mpg. Would it be impossible to combine open-mindedness with logic?
__________________
1987 300D, arctic white/palomino--314,000 miles
1978 240D 4-speed, Euro Delivery, light ivory/bamboo--370,000 miles
2005 Jeep Liberty CRD Limited, light khaki/slate--140,000 miles
2018 Chevy Cruze diesel, 6-speed manual, satin steel metallic/kalahari--19,000 miles
1982 Peugeot 505 diesel, 4-speed manual, blue/blue, 130,000 miles
1995 S320, black/parchment--34,000 miles (Dad's car)
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:42 PM
BodhiBenz1987's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast
Posts: 3,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by yellowbenz View Post
Well, I won't quibble about the fusion info. EPA hasn't rated it yet. Only review I can recall for sure was a combined 43mpg city/ highway. However, take your own advice and learn about how the prius works. There is no way that car would get over 40 mpg if the battery/electric motor were not involved in propelling the car at highway speeds. Honestly, it's cool technology that any gear head can get excited about. Furthermore, if you want unbiased info go to the epa site. Jetta diesel 2009 30/41 city/ highway. 2009 Toyota Prius 48/45 city highway.
EPA rated the Fusion today ... final figures 36/41. I did go to the EPA site. I would imagine people will do better than 41 city ... as they do better than the EPA rating on the Jettas and Prius. EPA has gotten really stingy, which is good ... that's better than blown-up ratings.
__________________
1987 300D, arctic white/palomino--314,000 miles
1978 240D 4-speed, Euro Delivery, light ivory/bamboo--370,000 miles
2005 Jeep Liberty CRD Limited, light khaki/slate--140,000 miles
2018 Chevy Cruze diesel, 6-speed manual, satin steel metallic/kalahari--19,000 miles
1982 Peugeot 505 diesel, 4-speed manual, blue/blue, 130,000 miles
1995 S320, black/parchment--34,000 miles (Dad's car)
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bio300TDTdriver View Post
I think what you said is right on the mark.

My wife wanted a hybrid so we got one. You know, happy wife happy life.
Most of her friends drive minivans that get 15-16 mpg, while she gets 47 mpg. We may never break even on the extra cost in dollars, but there are other costs that matter as much to us.

We can start drilling everywhere Sarah Palin (remember her) wants us too. The reality is we run out of oil some day. It may not be in my life time, but certainly could happen in my kids lifetime. Then we need some alternatives. Hybrids may not be the answer, but we need to start somewhere.

You don't see Honda and Toyota needing a bailout to stay in business. They must be doing something right.
So the break even is in your mind... not based in real world facts or I guess you would have posted them- just your mind. Can I also then refute with my mind only?

How about this--- your hybrids designing, manufacturing, advertising, transporting, selling, recycling (at least one, perhaps three) and maintaining costs will be far greater in damage to the planet than keeping a MB diesel ever will be. And that's with diesel fuel- not counting bio diesel or SVO or burning other recycled petroleum.

Last edited by MTUpower; 12-23-2008 at 10:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:58 PM
yellowbenz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbia, Missouri
Posts: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTUpower View Post
So the break even is in your mind... not based in real world facts or I guess you would have posted them- just your mind. Can I also then refute with my mind only?

How about this--- your hybrids designing, manufacturing, advertising, transporting, selling, recycling (at least one, perhaps three) and maintaining costs will be far greater in damage to the planet than keeping a MB diesel ever will be. And that's with diesel fuel- not counting bio diesel or SVO or burning other recycled petroleum.
Discussing hybrids is the modern day equivalent of talking about religion or politics. Sad, really because if you like engineering and technology it really is pretty cool stuff.
__________________
Kevin

1978 300D
1979 240D
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 12-23-2008, 11:05 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by yellowbenz View Post
Discussing hybrids is the modern day equivalent of talking about religion or politics. Sad, really because if you like engineering and technology it really is pretty cool stuff.
No- it's not cool in my mind- what can you do to your hybrid other than drive it and own it? Can you work on it when it's broke? Can you find spare parts? Can you do anything other than be a nerd and be smug? (Not you personally btw)
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 12-23-2008, 11:05 PM
awsrock's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tinley Park, IL
Posts: 642
I'll take back my hybrid-tin-can remark, I think we were arguing about different things though.

Anyway, my only problem with hybrids is the way uninformed people treat them, (and when I say uninformed, I mean 20 year olds that could care less about what they drive, yet somehow think they know everything) i.e. overlooking other factors that can save them money, etc. Of course, not everyone wants to, or has the ability to, own an old car and work on it themselves. I guess I've just been so impressed with my car that I find it aggravating when diesels are basically left in the dust because of the bad rep they had back in the 70s and 80s. I mean, you look at europe and they have plenty of cars that are all diesel that are getting equal to or better mileage than hybrids are, but here people could care less, let alone allow the EPA to completely strangle the performance and efficiency potential of the diesels that actually DO make it over here. And while all these automakers are spending money trying to win the hybrid race, they all HAVE diesel options already!! It's just a matter of getting it here and telling the EPA to worry about other things. Ford works on a Fusion hybrid, while they have a diesel Focus that has amazing specs. Maybe if people weren't so concerned with their 0-60 times, diesels would be more welcomed. It's just baffling to me, but alas, I am a young angry person. Sorry for the rant.

I will say, though, that it is nice to see more and more hybrid SUVs- sure, they still might not get good mileage, but it is a big improvement!
__________________
Dan
2005 E320 CDI - 246k
1987 300SDL TD05-16g, Herlevi pump, Elbe manifold, 2.47 LSD - 213k
Past: 1987 300D - 264k
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 12-23-2008, 11:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Wakefield, RI
Posts: 2,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bio300TDTdriver View Post
I would argue that hybrids are way ahead of the TDIs. The TDIs are usually in the shop because of the plugged up intakes, due to the EGR. I can't stop by me Indie's garage without him showing me one.

You are correct that the huge advantage is in city driving, but we can still get 45 mpg on the highway at 70 mph. My wife can get 50 mpg if she keeps it at 60, but I can't drive that slowly.

I don't think of myself as pro hybrid or diesel. Like you said they both have their advantages. I try to defend the good points of the hybrids. When people start talking about tin cans, and replacing batteries, it irks me. They don't know what they are talking about and probably haven't set foot in a new hybrid.

The funny thing is, we were an hour away from purchasing a low mileage '04 Jetta. Someone beat us there with the cash. In hindsight, I probably have a much happier existence with the purchase we made.
What irks me is people who speak of TDI's and don't own one, don't know what they speak of. TDI's usually need an intake cleaning every 100K. So does any other diesel with a functioning EGR at US emissions specs. Our own vaunted MB's have the same issue. Turn down the EGR duty cycle and likely you will never need to clean it. Your indies and idiot My TDI has 110K and never been cleaned, doesn't appear to need it yet. I'm glad you like your hybrid, nothing wrong with that. I like the TDI, its been dead reliable, cheap to maintain, and averages 47mpg. Best ever of 49mpg at 80mph with the AC off. Never under 80mph on the highway. I prefer to give my money to Germans. And yes, I have driven a Prius plenty, neighbor has one and I take them to the train and pick them up in it once a month or so. Decent but I don't want one. Just isn't Teutonic enough.

RT
__________________
When all else fails, vote from the rooftops!
84' Mercedes Benz 300D Anthracite/black, 171K
03' Volkswagen Jetta TDI blue/black, 93K
93' Chevrolet C2500HD ExCab 6.5TD, Two-tone blue, 252K
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 12-23-2008, 11:15 PM
Unofficial wormcan opener
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ashland, MA
Posts: 2,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTUpower View Post
No- it's not cool in my mind- what can you do to your hybrid other than drive it and own it? Can you work on it when it's broke? Can you find spare parts? Can you do anything other than be a nerd and be smug? (Not you personally btw)
Yes I realize you are not quoting me.

I did work on mine. I added a block heater. Sure we only have 20,000 on the car, but there just isn't anything to fix. Change the oil every 10,000-12,000 and drive it. I suppose I'll have to change all 8 spark plugs in another 80,000 miles. Then in another 270,000 miles I may have to change the batteries.

What makes you think I have time to work on a hybrid. The other car in my sig. keeps me too busy to work on anything else. Yeah I know it's a 124. We can save the 123 vs. 124 debate for next year.
__________________
1987 300TD 309, xxx 2.8.2014 10,000 mile OCI


Be careful of the toes you step on today, as they may be connected to the ass you have to kiss tomorrow. anonymous

“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don’t matter, and those who matter won’t mind.” Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 12-23-2008, 11:17 PM
Unofficial wormcan opener
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ashland, MA
Posts: 2,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwthomas1 View Post
What irks me is people who speak of TDI's and don't own one, don't know what they speak of. TDI's usually need an intake cleaning every 100K. So does any other diesel with a functioning EGR at US emissions specs. Our own vaunted MB's have the same issue. Turn down the EGR duty cycle and likely you will never need to clean it. Your indies and idiot My TDI has 110K and never been cleaned, doesn't appear to need it yet. I'm glad you like your hybrid, nothing wrong with that. I like the TDI, its been dead reliable, cheap to maintain, and averages 47mpg. Best ever of 49mpg at 80mph with the AC off. Never under 80mph on the highway. I prefer to give my money to Germans. And yes, I have driven a Prius plenty, neighbor has one and I take them to the train and pick them up in it once a month or so. Decent but I don't want one. Just isn't Teutonic enough.

RT
He's an idiot because he shows me plugged intakes. You must have been captain of your debate team.

__________________
1987 300TD 309, xxx 2.8.2014 10,000 mile OCI


Be careful of the toes you step on today, as they may be connected to the ass you have to kiss tomorrow. anonymous

“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don’t matter, and those who matter won’t mind.” Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page