Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 05-08-2019, 09:43 AM
whipplem104's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 1,186
Quaife only fits up to the 3.06 gears. Then the carrier switches to a different offset for the ring gear to align with the pinion. Stupid Mercedes way of setting up differentials.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-08-2019, 11:25 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roncallo View Post

. . . . I'm currently running the 2.47 had a 2.65 in my M120 560.. . . . .

. . . . . so I want to do more testing before I swap in a 2.82. . . . .
How are you going to handle the change in wheel speed signal ratio to the trans computer?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-08-2019, 11:35 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by whipplem104 View Post
Quaife only fits up to the 3.06 gears. Then the carrier switches to a different offset for the ring gear to align with the pinion. Stupid Mercedes way of setting up differentials.

Diffs ( non brand specific ) with a wide range of ratios have always moved the ring gear mounting surface but not for every ratio like MB. An example of a USA unit would be 3.27 and smaller number is one carrier and 3.45 and larger another.

In order to accomplish this wide range, the ring gear must be thicker as the numbers get larger. This leads to more rotating mass / material used. MB kept the ring gear thickness the same across all ratios and just moved the flange. We also don't know if there was a thickness limitation in their gear cutting machines when this was instituted.

While this causes issues for the microscopic number of people that swap ratios, it works out better for the 99.99999% that drive the car and not change things.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-08-2019, 06:59 PM
88Black560SL
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 3,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by 97 SL320 View Post
How are you going to handle the change in wheel speed signal ratio to the trans computer?
I use tone wheels bolted to my axle flanges. Changing the number of teeth on the tone wheels fools the trans control module. Been working fine for about 6 months now.
Attached Thumbnails
3.06 ATB Differential-tone-wheel-adjusting.jpg  
__________________
To see my 129 parts for sale visit:
http://stores.ebay.com/The-Mercedes-SL-Store
John Roncallo
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-08-2019, 07:01 PM
88Black560SL
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 3,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by whipplem104 View Post
Quaife only fits up to the 3.06 gears. Then the carrier switches to a different offset for the ring gear to align with the pinion. Stupid Mercedes way of setting up differentials.
And I guess Quaife doesn't make one for the 3.27. what about Wavetec.
__________________
To see my 129 parts for sale visit:
http://stores.ebay.com/The-Mercedes-SL-Store
John Roncallo
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-08-2019, 08:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roncallo View Post
What made you decide to go to a 3.06 over keeping the original 3.27.
As stated by others, it was the only choice. I built the diff from my 91 300CE and that car never felt over geared. To be honest though, that car had the best off idle torque of any 104.980 I've ever driven, and that's more than a few. Don't really know why, and never put much energy into finding out. The '90 CE has the '91's fuel distributor and EHA, its injectors, and its EZL, but the '90 still doesn't pull the same off idle, not even close. Long story short, in its current form its not a really fast car, so a bit of gearing change wont be a big deal. The '91 met its demise in a full throttle turn under adverse traction conditions when one wheel spun up and the other didn't have enough grip to keep from spinning out. If it had a limited slip diff, I doubt that would have happened.
__________________

90 300TE 4-M
Turbo 103, T3/T04E 50 trim
T04B cover .60 AR
Stage 3 turbine .63 AR
A2W I/C, 40 LB/HR
MS2E, 60-2 Direct Coil Control
3" Exh, AEM W/B O2
Underdrive Alt. and P/S Pulleys,
Vented Rear Discs, .034 Booster.
3.07 diffs 1st Gear Start

90 300CE
104.980
Milled & ported head, 10.3:1 compression
197° intake cam w/20° advancer
Tuned CIS ECU
4° ignition advance
PCS TCM2000, built 722.6
600W networked suction fan
Sportline sway bars
V8 rear subframe, Quaife ATB 3.06 diff
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-09-2019, 07:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by duxthe1 View Post
The '91 met its demise in a full throttle turn under adverse traction conditions when one wheel spun up and the other didn't have enough grip to keep from spinning out. If it had a limited slip diff, I doubt that would have happened.
A limited slip might have helped as long as both tires don't break traction, however, once traction is lost the tail will come around. RE the loss of traction limit with a LSD might have been higher and more severe due to the loss of lateral grip where an open diffs loss of traction is lower and more stable due to a loss of forward motion.

A limited slip tends to break traction of the inside wheel during a turn under power. ( Think a solid non diff axle / go kart ) This is usually OK unless the outside wheel has limited traction. I'm betting this is why MB decided to use ASR rather than a LSD. Going the ASR route also gives the possibility of ESP.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-09-2019, 07:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roncallo View Post
I use tone wheels bolted to my axle flanges. Changing the number of teeth on the tone wheels fools the trans control module. Been working fine for about 6 months now.

Will the change from 2.47 to 2.82 result in an even tone wheel tooth count change?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-09-2019, 08:03 PM
88Black560SL
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 3,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by 97 SL320 View Post
Will the change from 2.47 to 2.82 result in an even tone wheel tooth count change?
2.65 is the baseline with a 48 tooth wheel.

To use a 2.47 ratio multiply tooth count by 2.65/2.47 = 48*2.65/2.47 = 51.49 Round to 51.

To use a 2.82 ratio multiply tooth count by 2.65/2.82 = 48*2.65/2.82 = 45.11 Round to 45.

Didn't think this would work but it does. Still looking for any adverse issues at this time but none so far.

2.47 is about the worst case scenario. I could probably use a 51 or 52 tooth wheel. That is one of the reasons I elected to try it first.
__________________
To see my 129 parts for sale visit:
http://stores.ebay.com/The-Mercedes-SL-Store
John Roncallo
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-09-2019, 11:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,534
In another thread I recall whipplem104 saying that the room for wheel speed error is very small, looks like there is some room.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-10-2019, 05:44 AM
88Black560SL
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 3,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by 97 SL320 View Post
In another thread I recall whipplem104 saying that the room for wheel speed error is very small, looks like there is some room.
I don't know what the threshold is but 1% appears to be acceptable, 7% is not acceptable.
__________________
To see my 129 parts for sale visit:
http://stores.ebay.com/The-Mercedes-SL-Store
John Roncallo
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-10-2019, 09:51 AM
whipplem104's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 1,186
% error threshold is somewhat vehicle speed dependent. At low speeds in low gear you can have more slip from driveline components and resolution. And your rpm differential is low. At high speeds you may find that error of a small percent is large enough to trip a fault. I do not think 1% will ever throw a fault. I do not know the exact number or actual fault threshold. But I would say probably up to 3% would work but maybe not sustained. 1-2% is pretty typical variance in meaurement though.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-10-2019, 05:57 PM
88Black560SL
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 3,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by whipplem104 View Post
% error threshold is somewhat vehicle speed dependent. At low speeds in low gear you can have more slip from driveline components and resolution. And your rpm differential is low. At high speeds you may find that error of a small percent is large enough to trip a fault. I do not think 1% will ever throw a fault. I do not know the exact number or actual fault threshold. But I would say probably up to 3% would work but maybe not sustained. 1-2% is pretty typical variance in meaurement though.
1% seems to work well for at least up to 100MPH at this point, with at least 10 min sustained speeds of 90MPH last weekend and has worked well since September.
__________________
To see my 129 parts for sale visit:
http://stores.ebay.com/The-Mercedes-SL-Store
John Roncallo
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-14-2019, 08:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,326
I dug out my V8 rear diff cover and snapped a couple of comparison pics for those unfamiliar with the difference. The V8 part has a 129 part number. It also has cooling fins and vertical internal baffling in addition to mounting points spread several inches further apart compared to the 6cyl part.

After cleaning it up good I ran a bead of sealer and bolted it up. I also cleaned up the ABS sensor bracketry and bolted that to the housing. At this point it is finished. Still no Idea when I'll get it swapped in with a V8 rear subframe. Rear lower ball joints are also on the to do list so that is a whole bunch of labor added all up. Just in time to loose one of my weekend days to the farmers market my nursery sells at starting this weekend. Not enough hours in the day or days in the week.
Attached Thumbnails
3.06 ATB Differential-20190514_120110.jpg   3.06 ATB Differential-20190514_120133.jpg  
__________________

90 300TE 4-M
Turbo 103, T3/T04E 50 trim
T04B cover .60 AR
Stage 3 turbine .63 AR
A2W I/C, 40 LB/HR
MS2E, 60-2 Direct Coil Control
3" Exh, AEM W/B O2
Underdrive Alt. and P/S Pulleys,
Vented Rear Discs, .034 Booster.
3.07 diffs 1st Gear Start

90 300CE
104.980
Milled & ported head, 10.3:1 compression
197° intake cam w/20° advancer
Tuned CIS ECU
4° ignition advance
PCS TCM2000, built 722.6
600W networked suction fan
Sportline sway bars
V8 rear subframe, Quaife ATB 3.06 diff
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-15-2019, 09:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,534
Just to round out the thread , please post the part numbers on the covers when you get a chance.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page